Digital Sovereignty and the Arbitral Frontier: Resolving Multi-Jurisdictional Technology Disputes through Lex Informatica

Main Article Content

Mr Sarthak Sikarwar
Ms Shreya Manoga

Abstract

This paper examines the structural incompatibility between digital sovereignty regimes such as the EU’s GDPR, India’s DPDP Act (2023) [1]and China’s Data Security Law (2021)[2] and the delocalized, transnational character of international commercial arbitration in technology disputes. It argues that Lex Informatica, understood not merely as technical code but as a coherent normative framework capable of generating enforceable transnational obligations, offers the most jurisprudentially defensible basis for resolving multi-jurisdictional technology disputes in the arbitral forum. Proceeding through doctrinal synthesis and comparative analysis, the paper builds on Reidenberg’s conception of Lex Informatica [3]and Lessig’s ‘code is law’ thesis[4], examining how arbitral tribunals may invoke code-based norms under Article 28 of the UNCITRAL Model Law as substantive rules governing the merits of a dispute. It further explores the tension between data sovereignty statutes as mandatory overriding norms (lois de police) and party autonomy, with particular attention to decentralized on-chain arbitration (the Kleros protocol) and Indian law’s own readiness for this shift. The paper concludes by proposing a tripartite harmonization framework (the ‘Digital Arbitral Sovereignty Compact’ (DASC) as a roadmap for reconciling state regulatory prerogatives with the demand for a legally certain, technologically sophisticated dispute resolution architecture.


[1] Greenleaf, G. (2024). India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023: A unique addition to global standards. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105912.


[2] Creemers, R. (2022). China’s emerging data protection framework. Journal of Cybersecurity, 8(1), tyac011. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac011


[3] Reidenberg, J. R. (1997). Lex Informatica: The formulation of information policy rules through technology. Texas Law Review, 76(3), 553–593.


[4] Lessig, L. (1999). Code: And other laws of cyberspace. Basic Books.


 

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Mr Sarthak Sikarwar

Student, UPES, Dehradun, Uttarakhand

 

Ms Shreya Manoga

Student, UPES, Dehradun, Uttarakhand

 

Cite this article

Mr Sarthak Sikarwar, M., & Ms Shreya Manoga, M. (2026). Digital Sovereignty and the Arbitral Frontier: Resolving Multi-Jurisdictional Technology Disputes through Lex Informatica. International Journal of Humanities & Legal Research, 2(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.64261/qatkqh03
Mr Sarthak Sikarwar Mr Sarthak Sikarwar, Ms Shreya Manoga Ms Shreya Manoga. "Digital Sovereignty and the Arbitral Frontier: Resolving Multi-Jurisdictional Technology Disputes through Lex Informatica." International Journal of Humanities & Legal Research, vol. 2, no. 4, 2026, pp. 1-12.
Mr Sarthak Sikarwar Mr Sarthak Sikarwar, Ms Shreya Manoga Ms Shreya Manoga. "Digital Sovereignty and the Arbitral Frontier: Resolving Multi-Jurisdictional Technology Disputes through Lex Informatica." International Journal of Humanities & Legal Research 2, no. 4 (2026): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.64261/qatkqh03
Mr Sarthak Sikarwar, M., and Ms Shreya Manoga, M. 2026. Digital Sovereignty and the Arbitral Frontier: Resolving Multi-Jurisdictional Technology Disputes through Lex Informatica. International Journal of Humanities & Legal Research, 2(4), pp.1-12.
Mr Sarthak Sikarwar M, Ms Shreya Manoga M. Digital Sovereignty and the Arbitral Frontier: Resolving Multi-Jurisdictional Technology Disputes through Lex Informatica. International Journal of Humanities & Legal Research. 2026;2(4):1-12.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.